Talk:The FAnG incident: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
1) i did edit, but i do think that if you arent sure about the information you are posting, then dont post it. - alch | 1) i did edit, but i do think that if you arent sure about the information you are posting, then dont post it. - alch | ||
Not at all. People posting incorrect information as part of a larger post is a good thing. This article wouldn't have existed if it hadn't been posted with the misinformation. If just 1 person reads it, we've accomplished something. Wikis usually have misinformation corrected reasonably quickly, due to everyone being able to edit them. -[[User:Banned|Banned]] 00:55, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 00:55, 10 January 2005
whoever pasted this, get your info right, it wasnt leff but webangel who pasted his info in #support - alch
I think that was stated in #pawiki when the article was added, but as no one was certain, LEFF was used. Now isn't this a bit pointless use of the discussion site? A wiki is made so that anyone can correct or add stuff... - Dukie
Discussions are healthy, as opposed to edit wars. -Banned 04:50, 9 Jan 2005 (GMT)
But is it really a discussion? It's merely a correction of a name, hardly worth any discussion as far as I can see... But nm that, doesn't really matter anyway -Dukie
1) i did edit, but i do think that if you arent sure about the information you are posting, then dont post it. - alch
Not at all. People posting incorrect information as part of a larger post is a good thing. This article wouldn't have existed if it hadn't been posted with the misinformation. If just 1 person reads it, we've accomplished something. Wikis usually have misinformation corrected reasonably quickly, due to everyone being able to edit them. -Banned 00:55, 10 Jan 2005 (GMT)
