Talk:Intel Officer - Revision history

Squidly at 20:16, 29 June 2006

2006-06-29T20:16:42Z

Show changes

194.117.134.196 at 18:22, 15 June 2006

2006-06-15T18:22:31Z

Show changes

Squidly at 06:41, 11 June 2006

2006-06-11T06:41:08Z

Show changes

222.121.35.81 at 14:59, 4 June 2006

2006-06-04T14:59:34Z

Show changes

Banned at 16:59, 13 January 2005

2005-01-13T16:59:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 13 January 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:

	-[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 00:04, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)		-[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 00:04, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			----
			''Suggested Intel Officer post'':

			An '''Intel Officer''' gathers information for his [[alliance]]. It is often also the intel officer's job to see to it that others don't acquire sensetive information from his or her own alliance. Some [[HC]] eschew having a seperate intel officer, prefering to keep the job at HC level.

			[[:Category:Terminology]]
			----
			In addition I'd suggest a [[Guide:Intel officer]] page or similar:

			An [[Intel Officer]]'s job is to gather information for their [[alliance]]. They have many tools available to complete this task. In addition some intel officers are required to keep tabs on their own alliance, to root out spies and plug leaks.

			== Identifying hostile planets ==
			Though an intel officer is primarily concerned with hostile alliances, one never knows when an alliance will turn from friend to foe. Therefore an intel officer should seek as complete information as possible on who's who.

			== Securing one's own alliance ==

			== Infiltrating other alliances ==

			Etc etc. (cba finishing this off atm)

Alch at 00:04, 12 January 2005

2005-01-12T00:04:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 12 January 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:

	But it '''is''' public. You put it up here. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:31, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)		But it '''is''' public. You put it up here. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:31, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			indeed. but not to the wide audiance, just for the "regulars" - there is no links to the main page etc... Anyway this is how i work, sorry.

			-[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 00:04, 12 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Banned at 21:31, 11 January 2005

2005-01-11T21:31:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 11 January 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Once i will add more text, ill go thru all the text and see what need to be changed or not, hence why this isnt public yet. -[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 20:38, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)		Once i will add more text, ill go thru all the text and see what need to be changed or not, hence why this isnt public yet. -[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 20:38, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			But it '''is''' public. You put it up here. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 21:31, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Alch at 20:38, 11 January 2005

2005-01-11T20:38:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 11 January 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Oh, and I think it's way too wordy and reduntant. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)		Oh, and I think it's way too wordy and reduntant. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			Once i will add more text, ill go thru all the text and see what need to be changed or not, hence why this isnt public yet. -[[User:Alch\|Alch]] 20:38, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Banned at 18:50, 11 January 2005

2005-01-11T18:50:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 11 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I disagree with a decent portion of this text. There are references to specific actions that are presented as an intel officer's job, but much of this is just opinion text on how an intel officer should do their job. There's no objectivity; there are no reasons why there shouldn't be an intel officer in an alliance. I appreciate that you're adding the stuff from the mentor manual, alch, but I think you should process it a bit before you post. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)		I disagree with a decent portion of this text. There are references to specific actions that are presented as an intel officer's job, but much of this is just opinion text on how an intel officer should do their job. There's no objectivity; there are no reasons why there shouldn't be an intel officer in an alliance. I appreciate that you're adding the stuff from the mentor manual, alch, but I think you should process it a bit before you post. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

			Oh, and I think it's way too wordy and reduntant. -[[User:Banned\|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Banned at 18:50, 11 January 2005

2005-01-11T18:50:01Z

New page

I disagree with a decent portion of this text. There are references to specific actions that are presented as an intel officer's job, but much of this is just opinion text on how an intel officer should do their job. There's no objectivity; there are no reasons why there shouldn't be an intel officer in an alliance. I appreciate that you're adding the stuff from the mentor manual, alch, but I think you should process it a bit before you post. -[[User:Banned|Banned]] 18:50, 11 Jan 2005 (GMT)