Ally - Revision history

109.76.91.36 at 18:42, 28 May 2010

2010-05-28T18:42:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 28 May 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]], [[Furgion]] was created in [[Round 3]].		Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]], [[Furgion]] was created in [[Round 3]].

	[[Category:Terminology]]		[[Category:Alliance Terminology]]

109.78.6.197 at 00:29, 6 January 2010

2010-01-06T00:29:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:29, 6 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.		Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.

	Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]] was created in [[Round 3]].		Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]], [[Furgion]] was created in [[Round 3]].

	[[Category:Terminology]]		[[Category:Terminology]]

Squidly at 02:18, 21 September 2006

2006-09-21T02:18:40Z

Show changes

209.203.227.139 at 08:02, 21 August 2006

2006-08-21T08:02:36Z

Show changes

Banned at 09:34, 16 December 2004

2004-12-16T09:34:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:34, 16 December 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.		Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.

	Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[~~bloc~~]] was created in [[Round 3]].		Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]] was created in [[Round 3]].

	[[Category:Terminology]]		[[Category:Terminology]]

Banned at 09:24, 16 December 2004

2004-12-16T09:24:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 16 December 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.		Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.

	Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[~~block~~]] was created in [[Round 3]].		Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[bloc]] was created in [[Round 3]].

	[[Category:Terminology]]		[[Category:Terminology]]

Banned at 09:17, 16 December 2004

2004-12-16T09:17:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 16 December 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Two ~~alliances~~ are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.		Two [[alliance]]s are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.

			Much controversy has surrounded allying since the original [[block]] was created in [[Round 3]].

	[[Category:Terminology]]		[[Category:Terminology]]

Banned at 04:01, 14 December 2004

2004-12-14T04:01:37Z

New page

Two alliances are said to be '''allied''' when they have engaged in an active cooperation to attack specific, common enemies. As these agreements are often considered binding for a full round and a factor in early stagnation, it has become uncommon for alliances to use this term about their own agreements, prefering to call them [[NAP]]s.

[[Category:Terminology]]