<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=205.243.112.227</id>
	<title>Planetarion Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=205.243.112.227"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/205.243.112.227"/>
	<updated>2026-06-06T04:21:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/index.php?title=Talk:Round_12:Raider&amp;diff=20316</id>
		<title>Talk:Round 12:Raider</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://clawofdarkness.com/pawiki/index.php?title=Talk:Round_12:Raider&amp;diff=20316"/>
		<updated>2012-02-18T14:31:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;205.243.112.227: bNeQWlLulBP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Yeah, I agree. A thnceical solution will only go so far.I have seen wikis work, but those were focused, project specific wikis where a small number of very dedicated people felt responsible for it. Your typical corporate wiki will usually end in chaos because documentation never has the priority it deserves. The color coding approach helps to identify  hot spots , but if nobody takes responsibility, the wiki will still decay.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>205.243.112.227</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>